Supreme Court rules against Aereo

In a big blow to cord-cutters, the Supreme Court ruled against Aereo, essentially dealing the small startup a death blow.  If you’re not familiar with Aereo, they had equipment installed in major cities with one antenna per subscriber.  Each subscriber could tune their antenna to record any over the air TV signals, and then stream that data to their computers or mobile devices over the internet.  Aereo’s position was that the one-antenna-per-subscriber made them different than a traditional cable company, but the Court ruled otherwise in a 6-3 decision.  Bummer.

Read more at TechCrunch or SlashGear.

The Wil Wheaton Project

So, if you’re a true geek, you probably know by now that Wil Wheaton has his own weekly TV show now, called, you guessed it, The Wil Wheaton Project (I hope they didn’t spend too long thinking up that name…).  If you didn’t already know about it…it’s a weekly look into geek culture, and is, so far, not bad!  My one complaint is that he talks about Game of Thrones…which I still haven’t caught up on (but that’s my own fault). Wil has a long blog post about the history of the show that’s worth reading, too.

Cord-cutters won’t have an easy time watching the show as it’s not available in iTunes.  You can find it on Bittorrent of course, or if you have family members that have cable or satellite and are willing to share their login with you, you can watch episodes on the day after they air.  There’s also a SyFy iPad app that works the same way (you need a cable/satellite login)…but allows you to then play that video on your TV via an AppleTV.

Amazon Fire TV Review

Amazon Fire TVAmazon’s $99 Fire TV is the latest entry in the set top box market…so how does it stack up against AppleTV?  Read on for my Amazon Fire TV review.

My out of the box experience was actually pretty horrible, but I attribute this to immature software and expect it’ll improve over time.  The problem I had was getting it to work with the 720p LCD TV in our family room.  When powering up, it’d display the Amazon Fire TV logo, then the screen would go dark.  It would work just fine with my 1080p projector though, so using that, I manually set the Fire TV to 720p resolution, and was then able to get it to work with my TV.  However, streaming videos from Amazon Instant Video do not play, it’s just a black screen (they work fine on the 1080p projector).  Videos from third party apps play just fine…it’s the Amazon content that won’t play.  I expect this will be fixed by future software updates, just be forewarned if you buy a Fire TV and experience this blank screen on startup.

The Fire TV is very app-focused, like the AppleTV.  What I mean is, if you click on movies or TV, that’s searching Amazon’s content…if you want to search Netflix, or even your own content, you need to go to the app for that.  To play movies or TV shows you’ve ripped to your computer, you’d need to install an app like Plex to access those.  So in this respect it’s not a lot different than AppleTVAppleTV also tucks your ‘created’ content into its own section (‘computers’) and requires you to install software (iTunes) on the computer that houses the content you want to access.

There are some nice games available for free on the Fire TV, and we found them really enjoyable, even with using just the included remote (yes, the optional game controller would be wise, but it was nice to see good levels of functionality with just the remote!).

I don’t like how the Fire TV organizes content in my Instant Video watchlist…the interface for the PS3 is still better for that IMO (but then, maybe I  just need to adapt…).  Just doesn’t work well scrolling through the list one item at a time instead of having categories or genres like AppleTV.  There’s also no way to search for movies and TV shows that are free for Prime subscription members – yes it tells you which qualify, but you can’t limit your search to just that.  The font size used for some on screen information is incredibly tiny (guess I need a bigger TV? 😉 ).  The voice search works pretty well.  These are just relatively minor software gripes…and looking at the effort they’ve obviously put into the user interface so far, I expect it’ll improve quickly from here.  Menu navigation was smooth and quick, the software seemed pretty solid where it really counted (well, except for being unable to play Amazon Instant Video selections on my TV!).

So what’s the verdict?  Well when it comes to functionality, the Fire TV has a couple advantages over the AppleTV – voice search, and games.  However, Apple is rumored to be releasing a new AppleTV soon that includes both of those options…so that advantage may be short-lived.  With either of these products though, to really take advantage of them, you need to buy in to the whole ecosystem the manufacturers’ promote.  That means buying or renting movies and TV shows from one or the other, installing computer-based software to organize your home movie library, using a compatible tablet to stream video to your TV, buying either an iPhone or a Amazon Fire Phone (those should appear later this year), etc.  You’re not looking at a $99 purchase…that’s just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how this product will impact your life.  So, be prepared for that.  My personal preference is still the AppleTV, mostly because I’ve already invested in that Apple ecosystem and am very happy with it.  For people still transitioning to this connected lifestyle…Amazon is managing to bring to market a pretty solid lineup of products to compete with Apple (I’d probably rank Microsoft a distant 3rd).  No matter which one you opt for…you’ll be happiest if you buy in to the whole ecosystem.  Oh, but if you’re thinking about buying a new Apple TV right now…wait for the new one to be released later this year with voice search and games.

Disclaimer – I own stock in both Amazon AND Apple…hedging my bets you might say…but the truth is they’re both doing a really good job in this personal electronics space.

Internet-based TV on the way?

Good news for those wishing for the death of traditional are currently being struck between various companies that allow for internet-based distribution of TV content.  The latest is between Dish Network and Disney, with Verizon and DirecTV also rumored to be pursuing similar content deals.  This means a potential end to the near-monopoly of cable companies and increased competition in the marketplace.  It also opens the door for Apple to move their AppleTV past the ‘hobby’ stage into a disruptive force in that market (or so I hope).  Read more over at Engadget.

More cracks in the TV industry’s business model

aereo-screenshotThe TV industry is moving ever closer to either collapse or a reinvention of their business model.  They’ve been resisting change for years, but just like the music industry before them, technology is enabling inevitable change.  A federal appeals court just ruled in favor of Aereo, a service which lets people watch over-the-air TV when they want, where they want, delivered over the internet to iPads or any device.  TV networks fought this, naturally, but lost (they may yet appeal to the Supreme Court, but that’s their only option at this point).  Read here for more on that.

The other story of late is season three of Game of Thrones debuted to record numbers of viewers.  What’s significant though is that it also set a record for the largest BitTorrent swarm – people are downloading this in huge numbers, as HBO does not make it available to non-HBO subscribers for quite some time.  Remember how Napster helped lead to the upending of the music industry?  Something similar is happening with TV.  The cost to gain access to a single show is so high that people are choosing the only other option (other than wait months to a year for it to be available on DVD).  As iTunes showed when it debuted, people are willing to pay a reasonable amount for content, if delivered in a timely manner comparable to other options on the market.  The TV business model is more complex, but is proving to be incompatible with consumers’ current desires and technologies.

Combine this with Netflix and Amazon producing their own shows, and we’re seeing an imminent collapse of the TV industry as it has been known…and the birth of something much more consumer friendly.

Traditional TV is dying…

TV networks have resisted the push by Apple, Google, and others to go to more of a channel less, video-on-demand business model for years…but they’re fighting a losing battle.  The consumers want it, and the technology makes it easy.  The latest development is seeing these video-on-demand companies offer original programming…essentially starting to become a new sort of TV ‘channel’.  Netflix has House of Cards and Lilyhammer (with eight more shows in the pipeline), and Amazon has announced a new show called ‘Betas’.  When people start turning to these internet-based companies for their TV shows, the traditional model of cable boxes and TV guide ‘schedules’ will quickly become obsolete.  As someone who ‘cut the cord‘ years ago, I can’t wait!

Intel working on a TV solution, also

It seems every hardware company is working on creating a better TV experience (Apple, Google, and Samsung being the big ones).  Intel is now joining the mix with a set top box, but they’re encountering the same problem that has kept Apple’s TV in the labs instead of your living room.  Namely, they are up against content owners who like things the way they are and don’t want to change.  This ‘head in the sand’ approach is simply not going to work…technology will advance and change is inevitable.  This is much like the music companies resisting change to their business model, until file sharing services like Napster came along and forced change.  TV will eventually face similar pressure…if the TV content owners act now and partner with the tech companies, they can help shape the future of TV…rather than sit on the sidelines and watch it be shaped for them.

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑