FDA may allow unlabled use of Aspartame in Milk

The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) are asking the FDA to allow them to include Aspartame in milk without having to add any labeling indicating that this ingredient has been added.  Worse, it would apply to any artificial sweetener.  Consumers would have no indication that what they’re drinking may not be pure milk, but have artificial ingredients added.  It requires an incredible stretch of the imagination to see how this could be good for consumers, but that is the reality of the food production system that we have created and support in this country.

The government is accepting public comments on this issue through 5/21; follow this link.

For more on this issue, check out this article….it’s long but has a lot of good information in it and is worth reading!

Study finds 84% of all fish have unsafe levels of mercury

fish-2961289136516LOiThis is one of those stories I find almost too scary to be true…yet I don’t see reason to doubt it.  A study by the Biodiversity Research Institute (link) found that 84% of fish have levels of mercury that are unsafe, posing a health risk to humans.  So on the one hand, we’re told to eat more fish, it’s good for you…yeah well except for the mercury part of it. 🙁  Relative to other countries, fish in the US tested better, with a bit more than 40% of samples above the recommend mercury levels.  Most other countries ranked higher, in the 90+% range.  Swordfish and tuna rank as the worst (highest mercury concentrations).

(via CBS News)

Small-scale investing in solar

Interested in investing in solar, but at a smaller level than some multi-megawatt facility?  Then check out Mosaic.  I’m not affiliated with them and am not a current investor, but it’s a neat business model that I thought I’d pass along.  They treat your investment like a loan, to fund smaller scale solar energy projects.  Most projects listed are returning 4.5%, so it’s not some get rich quick scheme, but not a bad investment all in all.

Part Design for 3D Printing on a Cube

bracket_originalI’ve been really enjoying my Cube printer, but it has not been without its learning curve.  Like any part design, you need to design the part with the manufacturing process in mind, and I’m learning quite a bit about extruded filament part production.

One issue is that large parts with thick sections tend to warp.  The Cube software provides an option for a raft – basically a lattice of thin lines laid down first, providing a stable bed upon which to build the part – but this greatly increases the post-processing time.  Namely, you need to scrape or sand off the raft.  It’s not a huge deal but does waste material and time.

Consider the bracket design shown above.  It’s simple enough, with a uniform cross section and was designed to be printable without needing supports (thin webs of material to support overhangs and such).  However, when printing, this part would warp and curl, forcing me to abort the print.

To address this, I did a few things.  First, I added thin tabs at the corners to help hold those down.  The principle is similar to the raft, but much easier to clean up (just cut them off – very quick and clean).  This alone did not produce a repeatable, printable part.  So, I added large chamfers at all edges, to reduce the part thickness and reduce warping.  This did the trick, and I was able to repeatedly print this (I’m using ABS, for what it’s worth).  Here’s what the final design looks like:

bracket_mod

As I learn more, I’m just not seeing how this technology is ready for mainstream home use like some articles seem to suggest.  You need to be a tinkerer and know your way around CAD to get parts that are really going to do what you want.  For that type of person though, this printer is fantastic!  I’ve been able to iterate prototype parts much quicker than before and am producing better designs, faster.

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑